THE COLLECTIVE VOL 4 (2012)
D. Various filmmakers
JABB PICTURES
This dvd collection of short indie films, all by different directors is a lot of fun. As with any collection it is a hit and miss bag, but the good outweighs the bad here. Each filmmaker was given an EMOTION to use as the spring board for their film. Building the narrative around it. We watched this at our INDEPENDENT SHADOW CINEMA screening so I ended up watching the films completely out of order as they appear on the DVD, so this list does not represent the actual order.
101 TAYLOR ST opened the show for us and it was a good place to start. Directed by Jabb Pictures Jason Hoover the emotion taken on here is DENIAL (arguably not an emotion as much as act but whatever). The film is designed almost like a documentary with a droning narration telling us the story of an elderly woman who turned out to be one of they most prolific serial killers of the mid west. The film is constructed of a series a very well shot tableaux of the area's landscapes. It is the most experimental film in the package and is entirely effective. It creates a deep seated mood. The emotion should have been DREAD because the movie builds plenty of it.
Next up is HAPPY HOOKER BANG BANG from filmmaker David Paul Bonnell. He follows it up later with a second installment. The two emotions he uses are DESIRE and ENVY and he blatantly names his characters after the emotions. The first segment of this hooker duo starts out well enough with two roomates arguing about work. The more worldly of the two is a hooker and her plain friend is out of work and envy's her friends ability and money. Soon she is sneaking around, pretending to be Desire and gets tied to a bed about to be raped. The short had been straight forward and serious up to this point. But then it turns into chicks with guns comedy, letting it down. Hard.
The second installment HAPPY HOOKER BANG BANG: A LOVE STORY dispenses with any resemblance of seriousness for a straight up comedy. Some of it is kind of funny (The pimp character, Desire pulling a bomb out of her snatch) but over all, even at ten minutes it becomes kind of tiresome.
Next is LUKE 1:17 directed by 14 year old Dakota Meyer and it is one of my favorites of the volume. The emotion here is HATE and it is a decidedly serious segment with no supernatural trappings. Two brothers are trying to get by in the emotional wreckage of their Father murdering their mother and ending up in jail. The film feels like the best of the DOGMA 95 movies with naturalistic performances and shooting style. The climax is more an emotional gut punch than a visceral one and that is why it works. This kid has more of a grip of the mechanics of film than most people twice, or three times his age.
CONTRITION by Jim Dougherty is one of the strongest visually. But the story is ultimately very slight. Basically a werewolf story told in flashback. A geneticist accidentally creates a wolfman who turns on her family. This one clearly had the biggest budget of any of the movies and uses it well. It just could have stood another script draft to bring it all together.
FLASH OF WIRE by David Ross is a very interesting little movie. Taking the art film approach to explore SCHADENFREUDE (The emotion of taking pleasure in the pain of others). Shot in Black and White and using Greek Mythology as a reference point the film it follows a man at the dentist explaining his dreams. Ultimately everyone in the film comes to represent Greek Gods. It is a brave approach to the genre material. Apparently part of it was actually shot in Greece too.
James Manning directs the ghost story DEATH DO US PART. Easily the weakest entry (despite a fetching lead who has no problem getting naked). A house is haunted by the couple who died there and the investigator slowly becomes sexually enamored with the place. Hence why the emotion here is LUST. The segment is just way too leisurely paced for the inconsequential pay off.
FRANKIE is Jason Hoover's shot at GRIEF and is the one that has split audiences from the reviews I have read and at our screening as well. The most viscerally violent of this volume, it is one long take, with the camera circling around the protagonists, as they are tied up, interrogated and tortured by some guys they may or may not have wronged. For the most part it is quite disturbing and unsettling, it is only let down by the improv acting that works most of the time, but falls back on just saying "fuck" over and over.
Bryan Wolford’s MYCTOPHOBIA is largely very solid, grounded by a very good performance from the lead actress Kitsie Duncan. The movie deals with a woman who has an otherwise normal life but is crippled by her fear of the dark. Her therapist tells her to try getting used to the dark a little at at a time, so when her electric goes out it seems her madness will set in. But what she is unaware of is there is a very good reason to be afraid of the dark. This segment is only marred by some so so CGI. Otherwise it is one of the strongest of the set.
Finally TRUST is explored, in the form of misguided trust in the best movie of the set EPIDEMIC by Dustin Mills. It deals with an outbreak of some sort of viral infection. But we witness it through one characters slowly becoming sick until he finally calls on the government for help.
The one consistent annoyance for me was the filmmakers over reliance to CGI effects, 90% of them not well executed. MYCTOPHOBIA is probably the only one that called for those effects, but the others would have been much better served by just doing practical effects.
Review © Andrew Copp
Showing posts with label Werewolves. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Werewolves. Show all posts
Sunday, September 30, 2012
Wednesday, October 5, 2011
Halloween Horror Challenge Oct 4th: DOG SOLDIERS
DOG SOLDIERS (2002)
D. NEIL MARSHALL
ARTISAN
1.85
This debut feature film from Neil Marshall put him on the map and made him a major player in the genre. This along with GINGER SNAPS went a long way to make werewolves interesting again. Then TWILIGHT came along and made them goofy as hell but that is a whole other ball game...
The movie explores how a group of soldiers in training run into a family of werewolves in the hills of Scotland. After losing a few of their own they hole up in a small house with a local female who saves them during a fight and it becomes STRAW DOG SOLDIERS for a little while, until some fairly obvious plot twists happen in the last third of the movie.
The things the film have going for it are great designs on the werewolves themselves, a fantastic sense of action and terririfc frentic pace. Where it falls down is in the logic and script department. Neil Marshall is a terrific visualist and can wring suspence like few others, but as a writer he fails misreably at times, and this is a prime example (see DOOMSDAY for another example of his films which look great, is fun to watch but has a terrible script). Characters are faced with a supernatural situation, they appear to understand, but continue to treat it the same dumb way, never looking at it from a perspective that might save them. Characters in their midst is clearly a werewolf they even are given clues, but they never figure it out until it is too late. TWICE. Logic continually is thrown out in the face of forward moving action, and it ultimately hamstrings what starts out as a good, fun monster film. The first half is very recommended, but by the final third I found myself tunning out because the writing was just not working anymore.
Marshall has gotten much better as I feel THE DESCENT is one of the best horror films of the last ten years, and CENTURIAN, though not perfect (it has some writing issues as well) is pretty great too. But this has a lot of the birth pains of a debut film.
Review © Andrew Copp
Sunday, October 2, 2011
31 Day Horror Challenge: Oct 2nd: GINGER SNAPS
GINGER SNAPS (2000)
D. John Fawcett
Lions Gate
1.85
For reasons that I can't fully explain I have somehow missed this one up until now, so it was about time I pulled it off the shelf and checked it out. This Canadian made teen werewolf movie has a lot of respect in the horror industry in the last decade and I am happy to report that I can se why. Smartly scripted with a lot of strong undercurrent of teenage sexual tension, the film has a lot to say about growing up, sisterly bonds, and finding oneself in the shadow of someone who tends to shine brighter.
For the few uninitiated GINGER SNAPS is about two teenage sisters both of who are obsessed with death and have made a pact to be outcasts. Bridgett, (EmilyPerkins) the younger and more introverted of the two seems to have a more level head on her shoulders, while Ginger (Katherine Isabelle) seems to be more impulsive and manipulative. She is the one who has forced her sister into a suicide pact (more out of boredom than anything) and constantly seems to bemoan the lameness of everything around them. Neither girls have gotten their periods for reasons that are never explained. But Ginger finally does and on the way home from pulling a prank one night theay are attacked by a giant wolf. During the chase the wolf is hit by a van driven by the town drug dealer and killed. But Ginger slowly begins to change; both physically, growing a tail, claws and patches of hair, and emotionally; by becoming sexually agressive, bitchy and violent. It is only a matter of time before things turn violent, and the monster inside of Ginger will find the way out.
The movie is sleekly directly and moves at a great pace, asking you to think about the situations as they are put forth. But does so with some nicely placed humor along the way. The only real problem I had with GINGER SNAPS was that I found the character of Ginger to be fairly unlikable. I should have been connected to her more, but for all her problems and attempts at being an outcast she ultimately ends up being a bitch more often than not. A big part of the plot of course is the journey of her younger sister finding her way out from her more dominant sister, but I found it difficult to like Ginger at many times during the film.
But that is a small complaint in the over all final film which is a stylish, violent, and at the final moments, surprisinly touching, flick. I see why it resonated with the festival audiences, and genre fans when it was released. I'll get around to seeing the sequels at some point though I has heard from many they are not nearly as good.
Review © Andrew Copp
D. John Fawcett
Lions Gate
1.85
For reasons that I can't fully explain I have somehow missed this one up until now, so it was about time I pulled it off the shelf and checked it out. This Canadian made teen werewolf movie has a lot of respect in the horror industry in the last decade and I am happy to report that I can se why. Smartly scripted with a lot of strong undercurrent of teenage sexual tension, the film has a lot to say about growing up, sisterly bonds, and finding oneself in the shadow of someone who tends to shine brighter.
For the few uninitiated GINGER SNAPS is about two teenage sisters both of who are obsessed with death and have made a pact to be outcasts. Bridgett, (EmilyPerkins) the younger and more introverted of the two seems to have a more level head on her shoulders, while Ginger (Katherine Isabelle) seems to be more impulsive and manipulative. She is the one who has forced her sister into a suicide pact (more out of boredom than anything) and constantly seems to bemoan the lameness of everything around them. Neither girls have gotten their periods for reasons that are never explained. But Ginger finally does and on the way home from pulling a prank one night theay are attacked by a giant wolf. During the chase the wolf is hit by a van driven by the town drug dealer and killed. But Ginger slowly begins to change; both physically, growing a tail, claws and patches of hair, and emotionally; by becoming sexually agressive, bitchy and violent. It is only a matter of time before things turn violent, and the monster inside of Ginger will find the way out.
The movie is sleekly directly and moves at a great pace, asking you to think about the situations as they are put forth. But does so with some nicely placed humor along the way. The only real problem I had with GINGER SNAPS was that I found the character of Ginger to be fairly unlikable. I should have been connected to her more, but for all her problems and attempts at being an outcast she ultimately ends up being a bitch more often than not. A big part of the plot of course is the journey of her younger sister finding her way out from her more dominant sister, but I found it difficult to like Ginger at many times during the film.
But that is a small complaint in the over all final film which is a stylish, violent, and at the final moments, surprisinly touching, flick. I see why it resonated with the festival audiences, and genre fans when it was released. I'll get around to seeing the sequels at some point though I has heard from many they are not nearly as good.
Review © Andrew Copp
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




